Logo
componenthaproxy
Name
haproxy
Version
2.6.27
Type
library
Description
-
Licenses
GPL-2.0+ and LGPL-2.1+ with exceptions
PURL
-
CPE
cpe:2.3:a:haproxy:haproxy:2.6.27:-:*:*:*:*:*:*

Other Versions#


Project
Branch
Version
master
2.6.32

Patches#


#
Title
Author
Resolve
1
BUILD: atomic: atomic.h may need compiler.h on ARMv8.2-a
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>

Vulnerabilities#


Name
Analysis
Description
Exploitable
HAProxy through 3.4.0, fixed in commit 9a6d1fe, contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in hpack_dht_insert() within src/hpack-tbl.c that fails to validate the return value of hpack_dht_defrag() when the memory pool is exhausted. An attacker can trigger HPACK dynamic table insertions under memory pressure to dereference a NULL pointer and crash HAProxy worker processes, causing denial of service.
Exploitable
HAProxy through 3.4.0, fixed in commit 5985276, contains an integer overflow vulnerability in the fcgi_conn structure's drl field that allows buffer misparse as new FCGI record headers. When contentLength is 65535 and paddingLength is 1 or more, the drl field wraps to 0, causing incorrect record consumption and allowing malicious FastCGI backends to desynchronize the FCGI framing parser, potentially causing request routing errors, response smuggling, or memory safety issues.
Exploitable
An issue was discovered in HAProxy before 3.3.6. The HTTP/3 parser does not check that the received body length matches a previously announced content-length when the stream is closed via a frame with an empty payload. This can cause desynchronization issues with the backend server and could be used for request smuggling. The earliest affected version is 2.6.
Exploitable
HAProxy 2.2 through 3.1.6, in certain uncommon configurations, has a sample_conv_regsub heap-based buffer overflow because of mishandling of the replacement of multiple short patterns with a longer one.
Exploitable
Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') issue exists in HAProxy. If this vulnerability is exploited, a remote attacker may access a path that is restricted by ACL (Access Control List) set on the product. As a result, the attacker may obtain sensitive information.